The defeat of Mike Yanguas and Franco Stupaczuk against Paquito Navarro and Martín Di Nenno in the Málaga P1 quarter-finals not only highlighted the pair's temporary sporting difficulties, but also reignited a question about the Andalusian player's attitude when his partner is going through a rough patch.

Defeated 7-5, 6-3, Yanguas and Stupaczuk gave the impression of a disconnected team: little encouragement, minimal rallies, and a particularly withdrawn Mike Yanguas. A few hours later, Stupa posted a message that was hard to ignore:

"When there is no attitude, no team, no game plan, it is very difficult to compete well."

A statement that does not name anyone directly, but which seems to target the collective functioning of the pair more than the simple quality of play.

Stupaczuk was stubborn

It would be unfair to make Mike Yanguas solely responsible for this elimination.

Franco Stupaczuk had a poor match. The Argentinian stubbornly insisted on hitting and smashing, even though the conditions and the quality of his opponent's defense prevented him from finishing points. Paquito Navarro understood this perfectly and repeatedly blocked the ball, but Stupaczuk was unable to significantly alter his game plan.

This reluctance to further develop the point had already drawn criticism during his partnership with Juan Lebrón. The two had several tense discussions in 2025, with Lebrón regularly expressing his irritation with some of his partner's decisions. They later acknowledged the need to transform their disagreements into more constructive exchanges.

When support disappears

The problem isn't that Yanguas noticed Stupaczuk's difficulties. They were obvious. What's more concerning is his apparent inability to stay connected to his partner when the match slipped away from them.

His closed expression, his signs of annoyance, and the almost complete lack of encouragement did not help Stupa regain his composure. They even seemed to gradually affect the Andalusian's own level of play.

At this level, a partner's role isn't just to point out what's not working. They must also propose a solution, keep the team alive, and prevent the struggling player from sinking further. Stupaczuk could probably have varied his game more with more consistent support and genuine teamwork.

The previous Coki Nieto

The association with Coki Nieto offers an interesting point of comparison.

The Madrid native is not a left-handed player whose every shot can immediately end the point. His game relies more on speed, consistency, court coverage, and build-up play. With him, Yangas achieved very consistent results, notably reaching nine semi-finals in their first fifteen tournaments of the 2025 season, without managing to consistently break through to the final hurdle.

However, we must avoid caricature: Yanguas had publicly defended his partner, describing him as a "very complete" player, fast and more aggressive than he was portrayed. He also explained that they formed "a great team." In the same interview, he nevertheless acknowledged that, if he could recover a shot from another player, he would choose Tapia's or Augsburger's smash, precisely because it "makes the difference." AS collected these statements in September 2025.

This answer was primarily technical. But it also illustrates the type of left-handed player that seems to correspond to the padel style sought by Yanguas: a partner capable of very quickly turning a bad opponent's lob into a winning point.

Looking for a permanent finisher?

The question can therefore be asked: does Yanguas expect his left-back partners to possess the finishing ability of a Galán, a Tapia or an Augsburger?

These three players can take control of a rally and finish the point at the first real opportunity. But such profiles are extremely rare. Not all left-handed players in the top 10 can consistently deliver this power, and even the best have days when their smash doesn't work.

Yangas has legitimate ambitions, and his high standards partly explain his rise to seventh in the world rankings. But a partner isn't just a finisher tasked with converting opportunities created. A pair must also be able to collectively find another way forward when one of its players loses their effectiveness.

A shared responsibility

In Málaga, Stupaczuk played poorly and was too stubborn. Yanguas, for his part, did not display the attitude that could have helped his partner break out of this downward spiral.

Sporting responsibilities are therefore shared. But in a sport where communication and trust are essential, a lack of support can weigh as heavily as tactical errors.

Yanguas and Stupaczuk are more than capable of competing with the best pairs. Their current problem seems to be less about their potential than how they navigate difficult moments together. Because if the team falls apart as soon as the left-hand player stops finishing points, the same tensions are likely to resurface, regardless of the partner chosen.

Antoine Tricolet

I discovered the Padel I stumbled into Spain at a campsite. I was instantly hooked; passionate about padel, I follow international and regional news with the same excitement as the sport itself.

On the same subject

Tags