The president of the FFT announces that there will be a meeting between the entrepreneurs of the private sector, which therefore includes the clubs of padel but not that a priori.
“We will bring together entrepreneurs from padel"
An answer from Bernard Giudicelli to Internet users who criticize the position of the FFT in its general organization and its development policy. Clubs padel private have the feeling of being “totally forgotten”By the FFT. Players and club managers wonder if the FFT “really wants to develop the padel" ?
The President of the FFT actually confirms the words of the elected official in charge of padel, Hubert Picquier who explained that the FFT was going to offer a “conference of clubs of padel private ”.
So we should have a big private sector meeting ... To be continued.
The FFT was also asked to respond to the non-resumption of the padel in France while in almost all countries in Europe, sports activities, whose padel, resume ..
Bernard Giudicelli explained that he fought for the padel can be allowed in 1 on 1 like tennis. But scientific experts have decided otherwise, and they must be respected.
"The Padel is one of our disciplines and our affiliated clubs know it. We will continue to invest and develop it. I understand and share your disappointment.
I fought to the end including to defend the practice of padel in 1 on 1.
But the rule of defense of the health of the players defined by a scientific college composed, among others, of an immunologist and an infectious disease specialist must be observed. Better days will return and the padel will start afresh. ”
Internet users wanted to know who was hiding behind this college of scientific experts. The response of the president of the FFT is as follows:
“I'm talking to you about 2 doctors specializing in immunology and infectious disease who fight every day in Parisian hospitals to save lives and who have agreed to help us make decisions because they have skills that we don't have. End."
Answers which certainly could have brought some explanations on the operating mode of the FFT but obviously, the Net surfers estimate that these explanations “are not enough".
View comments
From Michel Laborie
Bravo Padel Magazine for deleting my previous comment on poor Giudicelli who wants us to play padel 1 against 1 !!
Where is freedom of expression ??
This means that this site is muzzled by the FFT, as it does with our padel (have suspected it a little given the orientation of some articles).
Binisti you are doing the beautiful on this site, have will see if you have enough c ... to leave this comment and the free expression to the players, to the private clubs who are fed up with this FFT which is a burden for our padel.
Hello,
How can we understand such restrictions when we open supermarkets and public transport ???
We really walk on our heads in this country!
From Michel Laborie
Hello Lil.
And yes, as long as our padel is tied up by the FFT, with the reasoning of its president and his acolytes, it will not be able to develop as in Spain and other countries.
It is absolutely necessary that our padel makes itself independent, and that it structures itself as it should be.
The players totally lack charisma and behave like sheep.
Hello
well noted, I remain puzzled, but appreciate that you have pushed the questions and that we have a beginning of explanation, even if I remain on my hunger and my misunderstanding on this subject
amicalement
Philippe
Hello Philippe Solano
I take advantage of your comment for myself to make one, because mine have deleted them from me.
Mr. Giudicelli fought for the padel 1 to 1 ...
It is with nonsense like this that our present society is in danger.
Sir, look at the World Padel Tour and you will see that the padel is played 2 against 2.
Concentrate on your tennis that needs it.
Michel Laborie
https://padelmagazine.fr/bernard-giudicelli-sexplique-sur-la-non-reprise-du-padel/