Before getting to the heart of the matter, we will return to the journey of Philippe Cerfont.
Who is he ? how did he end up in the padel ? What was his path up to becoming the President of FEPA?
Before becoming FEPA, we were talking about EPA. Is there a specific reason for this change?
What is the history of this organization? Why did you create it? What is its purpose ? Why not have created it with the FIP?
FEPA: Is it a provocation to the FIP that was already against having EPA?
The FEP and the FIP (International Federation of Padel) do not get along. Why ? What are the reasons which led these two institutions to go to war? What is the source of this conflict?
The world of padel hopes that this conflict will end, however, last November, the two institutions each organized 2 European Championships of Padel, one in Rome and the other in Lisbon. Can there be an end? Is it good for the image of padel ?
What could make the two institutions come together to work together?
We speak for the good of padel, yet “nobody wants to surrender for the good of our sport” can we read or hear in the padel. Is there not a risk of seeing the padel discredit oneself by finding ourselves in such a situation?
What is the relationship of FEPA with France and the FFT?
What are FEPA's links with the APT PADEL TOUR and the World Padel Tour ? If tomorrow, a stage of the APT takes place in Europe, we could see the FEPA partner of the event?
The FIP said it would study the case of nations that did not participate in the 2019 European Championships… Was there a follow-up? If the world championship takes place, what are the possible consequences for FEPA and for the nations which did not participate in the European Championships in Rome.
Can we take stock of FEPA?
What are the next FEPA deadlines?
What is FEPA's opinion on the organization of the World Cup in Qatar?
Do we have a chance to see our 2 international bodies come closer?